↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms and Functional Significance of Stroke-Induced Neurogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms and Functional Significance of Stroke-Induced Neurogenesis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quentin Marlier, Sebastien Verteneuil, Renaud Vandenbosch, Brigitte Malgrange

Abstract

Stroke affects one in every six people worldwide, and is the leading cause of adult disability. After stroke, some limited spontaneous recovery occurs, the mechanisms of which remain largely unknown. Multiple, parallel approaches are being investigated to develop neuroprotective, reparative and regenerative strategies for the treatment of stroke. For years, clinical studies have tried to use exogenous cell therapy as a means of brain repair, with varying success. Since the rediscovery of adult neurogenesis and the identification of adult neural stem cells in the late nineties, one promising field of investigation is focused upon triggering and stimulating this self-repair system to replace the neurons lost following brain injury. For instance, it is has been demonstrated that the adult brain has the capacity to produce large numbers of new neurons in response to stroke. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of stroke-induced adult neurogenesis, from a cellular and molecular perspective, to its impact on brain repair and functional recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,770,864
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,913
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,351
of 395,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#61
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.