↓ Skip to main content

NeuroFlow: A General Purpose Spiking Neural Network Simulation Platform using Customizable Processors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NeuroFlow: A General Purpose Spiking Neural Network Simulation Platform using Customizable Processors
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2015.00516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kit Cheung, Simon R. Schultz, Wayne Luk

Abstract

NeuroFlow is a scalable spiking neural network simulation platform for off-the-shelf high performance computing systems using customizable hardware processors such as Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). Unlike multi-core processors and application-specific integrated circuits, the processor architecture of NeuroFlow can be redesigned and reconfigured to suit a particular simulation to deliver optimized performance, such as the degree of parallelism to employ. The compilation process supports using PyNN, a simulator-independent neural network description language, to configure the processor. NeuroFlow supports a number of commonly used current or conductance based neuronal models such as integrate-and-fire and Izhikevich models, and the spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule for learning. A 6-FPGA system can simulate a network of up to ~600,000 neurons and can achieve a real-time performance of 400,000 neurons. Using one FPGA, NeuroFlow delivers a speedup of up to 33.6 times the speed of an 8-core processor, or 2.83 times the speed of GPU-based platforms. With high flexibility and throughput, NeuroFlow provides a viable environment for large-scale neural network simulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 55 40%
Computer Science 32 23%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,400,418
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,243
of 11,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,149
of 403,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#49
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.