↓ Skip to main content

A Model of Synaptic Reconsolidation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Model of Synaptic Reconsolidation
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00206
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B. Kastner, Tilo Schwalger, Lorric Ziegler, Wulfram Gerstner

Abstract

Reconsolidation of memories has mostly been studied at the behavioral and molecular level. Here, we put forward a simple extension of existing computational models of synaptic consolidation to capture hippocampal slice experiments that have been interpreted as reconsolidation at the synaptic level. The model implements reconsolidation through stabilization of consolidated synapses by stabilizing entities combined with an activity-dependent reservoir of stabilizing entities that are immune to protein synthesis inhibition (PSI). We derive a reduced version of our model to explore the conditions under which synaptic reconsolidation does or does not occur, often referred to as the boundary conditions of reconsolidation. We find that our computational model of synaptic reconsolidation displays complex boundary conditions. Our results suggest that a limited resource of hypothetical stabilizing molecules or complexes, which may be implemented by protein phosphorylation or different receptor subtypes, can underlie the phenomenon of synaptic reconsolidation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
France 2 5%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Master 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Engineering 4 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,266,974
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,729
of 11,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,424
of 350,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#76
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.