↓ Skip to main content

Interactions of Circadian Rhythmicity, Stress and Orexigenic Neuropeptide Systems: Implications for Food Intake Control

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions of Circadian Rhythmicity, Stress and Orexigenic Neuropeptide Systems: Implications for Food Intake Control
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Blasiak, Andrew L. Gundlach, Grzegorz Hess, Marian H. Lewandowski

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,632,807
of 26,446,252 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,318
of 11,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,133
of 327,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#66
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,446,252 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.