The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerebral Pathology and Cognition in Diabetes: The Merits of Multiparametric Neuroimaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2017.00188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank C. G. van Bussel, Walter H. Backes, Paul A. M. Hofman, Robert J. van Oostenbrugge, Martin P. J. van Boxtel, Frans R. J. Verhey, Harry W. M. Steinbusch, Miranda T. Schram, Coen D. A. Stehouwer, Joachim E. Wildberger, Jacobus F. A. Jansen |
| Abstract |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with accelerated cognitive decline and various cerebral abnormalities visible on MRI. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cognitive decline in diabetes still remain to be elucidated. In addition to conventional images, MRI offers a versatile set of novel contrasts, including blood perfusion, neuronal function, white matter microstructure, and metabolic function. These more-advanced multiparametric MRI contrasts and the pertaining parameters are able to reveal abnormalities in type 2 diabetes, which may be related to cognitive decline. To further elucidate the nature of the link between diabetes, cognitive decline, and brain abnormalities, and changes over time thereof, biomarkers are needed which can be provided by advanced MRI techniques. This review summarizes to what extent MRI, especially advanced multiparametric techniques, can elucidate the underlying neuronal substrate that reflects the cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,239
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,291
of 324,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#87
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.