↓ Skip to main content

DNA Methylation Changes in Intron 1 of Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cell 2 in Japanese Schizophrenia Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Methylation Changes in Intron 1 of Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cell 2 in Japanese Schizophrenia Subjects
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuta Yoshino, Yuki Ozaki, Kiyohiro Yamazaki, Tomoko Sao, Yoko Mori, Shinichiro Ochi, Jun-ichi Iga, Shu-ichi Ueno

Abstract

A hypothesis for schizophrenia (SCZ) called the "microglia hypothesis" has been suggested. In SCZ, expression of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) mRNA is higher in leukocytes than in healthy individuals. Here, the methylation rates of four CpG sites in TREM2 intron 1 that may bind important transcription factors and the correlation between the methylation rate and mRNA expression were determined. We compared the methylation rates in SCZ patients and age-matched controls (n = 50 each). SCZ patients had significantly lower methylation rates of CpG 2 (17.0 ± 6.7 vs. 20.2 ± 5.0; p = 0.02) and CpG 3 (23.8 ± 8.2 vs. 28.1 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). The average methylation rate (15.3 ± 5.2 vs. 17.6 ± 3.9; p = 0.009) was also lower. A significant negative correlation was found between TREM2 mRNA expression and the methylation rate of CpG 2 (r = -0.252, p = 0.012). SCZ susceptibility markers may include low methylation at TREM2 intron 1 and increased TREM2 mRNA levels. Our pilot study requires validation with higher numbers of participants and with other myeloid cell types.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,138
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,914
of 326,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#164
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.