↓ Skip to main content

Oxidative Stress Modifies the Levels and Phosphorylation State of Tau Protein in Human Fibroblasts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxidative Stress Modifies the Levels and Phosphorylation State of Tau Protein in Human Fibroblasts
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Ibáñez-Salazar, Bernardo Bañuelos-Hernández, Ildefonso Rodríguez-Leyva, Erika Chi-Ahumada, Elizabeth Monreal-Escalante, María E. Jiménez-Capdeville, Sergio Rosales-Mendoza

Abstract

Since the tau protein is closely involved in the physiopathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), studying its behavior in cellular models might lead to new insights on understanding this devastating disease at molecular levels. In the present study, primary cultures of human fibroblasts were established and used to determine the expression and localization of the tau protein in distinct phosphorylation states in both untransfected and tau gene-transfected cells subjected to oxidative stress. Higher immunopositivity to phospho-tau was observed in cell nuclei in response to oxidative stress, while the levels of total tau in the cytosol remained unchanged. These findings were observed in both untransfected cells and those transfected with the tau gene. The present work represents a useful model for studying the physiopathology of AD at the cellular level in terms of tau protein implications.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Professor 6 11%
Unspecified 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Neuroscience 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Unspecified 6 11%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,404
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,395
of 323,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#101
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.