↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebral Syphilitic Gumma: A Report of Three Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebral Syphilitic Gumma: A Report of Three Cases
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuefei Shao, Di Qiang, Yinhua Liu, Quan Yuan, Jin Tao, Bihua Ji

Abstract

Cerebral syphilitic gumma is very rare and is often pathologically confirmed following surgery. This study reports three patients with cerebral syphilitic gumma. The first case was a 62-year-old man who was admitted to our hospital due to speech arrest for 10 hours. Head MRI showed a nodular signal shadow with a significant enhancement and a significant centerline shift. He subsequently received surgery, and cerebral syphilitic gumma was confirmed by postoperative pathology. The second patient was a 66-year-old man who was admitted to our hospital due to complaints of gradually decreasing right eye vision and headache for nearly 50 days. Enhanced MRI at admission indicated irregular clumping of high-signal mixed with low-signal foci on the frontal lobe. Subsequently, he was operatively treated and was confirmed to have cerebral syphilitic gumma by postoperative pathology. The third patient was a 37-year-old man who was admitted to our hospital due to dizziness for approximately 15 days. Head MRI indicated a slightly abnormal lamellar and longer T1, T2 signal shadow on the left side. He did not receive surgery, and his symptoms disappeared after anti-syphilitic treatment. Hence, we recommend a critical interpretation of preoperative imaging data, understanding the unique changes that arise in the brain that can be detected through imaging, and an analysis of the patient history and laboratory tests to re-evaluate the value of surgery, with the ultimate goal of performing a stabilizing treatment for cerebral syphilitic gumma.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2024.
All research outputs
#18,049,512
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,453
of 11,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,044
of 347,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#192
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.