The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Oxytocin on Facial Expression and Identity Working Memory Are Found in Females but Not Males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tong Yue, Caizhen Yue, Guangyuan Liu, Xiting Huang |
| Abstract |
Although oxytocin (OXT) has been shown to increase the ability of face perception and processing, no study has explored whether it could improve the performance of working memory for emotional expression information in males and females. Thus, we performed a double-blind, mixed-design, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of OXT on temporary maintenance/manipulation of facial information through a facial expression (EMO) vs. identity (ID) working memory task, both for males (N = 45) and females (N = 46). Our results showed that in female participants, OXT increased the accuracy of the recognition of faces displaying angry and happy emotions, in the EMO tasks, and also reduced the response time to negative emotional faces, in the ID task. However, the above effects were not present in male subjects. These results indicate that OXT may increase the efficiency of working memory in face processing and this trend is reflected in females rather than in males. This study provides novel evidence for the sexually dimorphic effects of OXT on social cognition. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,807,357
of 26,407,726 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,171
of 11,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,918
of 344,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#68
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,407,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.