You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhibition of Epac2 Attenuates Neural Cell Apoptosis and Improves Neurological Deficits in a Rat Model of Traumatic Brain Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00263 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling Zhang, Li Zhang, Huixiang Liu, Feng Jiang, Huanjing Wang, Di Li, Rong Gao |
| Abstract |
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and disability worldwide. TBI-induced neuronal apoptosis is one of the main contributors to the secondary injury process. The aim of this study is to investigate the involvement of Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 2 (Epac2) on TBI. We found that the expression level of Epac2 surrounding the injured area of brain in rats of TBI model was significantly increased at 12 h after TBI. The role of Epac2 in TBI was further explored by using a selective Epac2 antagonist ESI-05 to decrease the Epac2 expression. We discovered that inhibition of Epac2 could improve the neurological impairment and attenuate brain edema following TBI. The Epac2 inhibition effectively reduced neuronal cell death and P38 MAPK signaling pathway may be involved in this process. Our results suggest that inhibition of Epac2 may be a potential therapy for TBI by reducing the neural cell death, alleviating brain edema and improving neurologic deficits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,459
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,585
of 340,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#231
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.