The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-invasive Investigation of Human Hippocampal Rhythms Using Magnetoencephalography: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00273 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Pu, Douglas O. Cheyne, Brian R. Cornwell, Blake W. Johnson |
| Abstract |
Hippocampal rhythms are believed to support crucial cognitive processes including memory, navigation, and language. Due to the location of the hippocampus deep in the brain, studying hippocampal rhythms using non-invasive magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings has generally been assumed to be methodologically challenging. However, with the advent of whole-head MEG systems in the 1990s and development of advanced source localization techniques, simulation and empirical studies have provided evidence that human hippocampal signals can be sensed by MEG and reliably reconstructed by source localization algorithms. This paper systematically reviews simulation studies and empirical evidence of the current capacities and limitations of MEG "deep source imaging" of the human hippocampus. Overall, these studies confirm that MEG provides a unique avenue to investigate human hippocampal rhythms in cognition, and can bridge the gap between animal studies and human hippocampal research, as well as elucidate the functional role and the behavioral correlates of human hippocampal oscillations. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 58% |
| Scientists | 21 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 30 | 27% |
| Psychology | 19 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,315,193
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#587
of 11,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,896
of 341,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#19
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.