The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Injury of the Ascending Reticular Activating System Following Whiplash Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sung H. Jang, Seong H. Kim, Young H. Kwon |
| Abstract |
Objectives: This study investigated injuries of the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) following whiplash injury, in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Methods: Twenty-three patients with whiplash injury and 26 healthy control subjects were recruited for this study. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was used for evaluating sleepiness. According to the ESS score, the patients were classified into two groups: subgroup A - ESS score <10, and subgroup B - ESS score ≥10. Three components of the ARAS (lower dorsal, lower ventral, and upper) were evaluated for fractional anisotropy (FA) and tract volume (TV). Results: No significant differences were observed in the FA and TV values of the lower dorsal and upper ARAS between the patient and control groups (p > 0.05). Conversely, the values of FA and TV in the lower ventral ARAS of the patient group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Comparing the values of subgroups A and B, the TV value of subgroup B was significantly lower than subgroup A (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the values of the FA and TV in the lower dorsal and upper ARAS, and the FA value in the lower ventral ARAS (p > 0.05). Conclusions: We found significant injury of the lower ventral ARAS in EDS patients with whiplash injury. These results suggest that diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) could provide useful information for detecting injuries of the ARAS following whiplash injury, in patients with EDS. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,672
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,264
of 344,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#195
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.