↓ Skip to main content

Neuromorphic Event-Based Generalized Time-Based Stereovision

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuromorphic Event-Based Generalized Time-Based Stereovision
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.00442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sio-Hoi Ieng, Joao Carneiro, Marc Osswald, Ryad Benosman

Abstract

3D reconstruction from multiple viewpoints is an important problem in machine vision that allows recovering tridimensional structures from multiple two-dimensional views of a given scene. Reconstructions from multiple views are conventionally achieved through a process of pixel luminance-based matching between different views. Unlike conventional machine vision methods that solve matching ambiguities by operating only on spatial constraints and luminance, this paper introduces a fully time-based solution to stereovision using the high temporal resolution of neuromorphic asynchronous event-based cameras. These cameras output dynamic visual information in the form of what is known as "change events" that encode the time, the location and the sign of the luminance changes. A more advanced event-based camera, the Asynchronous Time-based Image Sensor (ATIS), in addition of change events, encodes absolute luminance as time differences. The stereovision problem can then be formulated solely in the time domain as a problem of events coincidences detection problem. This work is improving existing event-based stereovision techniques by adding luminance information that increases the matching reliability. It also introduces a formulation that does not require to build local frames (though it is still possible) from the luminances which can be costly to implement. Finally, this work also introduces a methodology for time based stereovision in the context of binocular and trinocular configurations using time based event matching criterion combining for the first time all together: space, time, luminance, and motion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 32%
Engineering 8 24%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,404
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,973
of 341,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#148
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.