The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhibition of NF-κB Signaling Pathway by Resveratrol Improves Spinal Cord Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luyao Xu, Benson O. A. Botchway, Songou Zhang, Jingying Zhou, Xuehong Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,330,778
of 26,493,550 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,088
of 11,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,322
of 359,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#137
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,550 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.