The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Impedance Matter When Recording Spikes With Polytrodes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joana P. Neto, Pedro Baião, Gonçalo Lopes, João Frazão, Joana Nogueira, Elvira Fortunato, Pedro Barquinha, Adam R. Kampff |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 10 | 37% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 27% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 57 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 54 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,511,502
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,482
of 11,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,105
of 360,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#42
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.