You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modulation of Working Memory Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: A Direct Comparison Between TACS and TDCS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franziska Röhner, Carolin Breitling, Katharina S. Rufener, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Hermann Hinrichs, Kerstin Krauel, Catherine M. Sweeney-Reed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 28 | 23% |
| Psychology | 21 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 50 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,672
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,166
of 362,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#217
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.