You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00787 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauran Cole, Adrianna Giuffre, Patrick Ciechanski, Helen L. Carlson, Ephrem Zewdie, Hsing-Ching Kuo, Adam Kirton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,609
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,841
of 363,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#162
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.