The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges and Perspectives of Quantitative Functional Sodium Imaging (fNaI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00810 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Frank Riemer, Fulvia Palesi, Antonio Ricciardi, Gloria Castellazzi, Xavier Golay, Ferran Prados, Bhavana Solanky, Egidio U. D’Angelo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 21% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,790,822
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,369
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,298
of 362,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#65
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.