The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dose-Dependent Effects of Closed-Loop tACS Delivered During Slow-Wave Oscillations on Memory Consolidation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00867 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron P. Jones, Jaehoon Choe, Natalie B. Bryant, Charles S. H. Robinson, Nicholas A. Ketz, Steven W. Skorheim, Angela Combs, Melanie L. Lamphere, Bradley Robert, Hope A. Gill, Melissa D. Heinrich, Michael D. Howard, Vincent P. Clark, Praveen K. Pilly |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 19% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,692,145
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,855
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,796
of 446,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#92
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.