The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparative Atlas-Based Recognition of Mild Cognitive Impairment With Voxel-Based Morphometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00916 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuqing Long, Jinchang Huang, Bo Li, Zuojia Li, Zihao Li, Hongwen Chen, Bin Jing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,623,572
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,051
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,992
of 445,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#54
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.