The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
μ-Rhythm Extracted With Personalized EEG Filters Correlates With Corticospinal Excitability in Real-Time Phase-Triggered EEG-TMS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2018.00954 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Schaworonkow, Pedro Caldana Gordon, Paolo Belardinelli, Ulf Ziemann, Til Ole Bergmann, Christoph Zrenner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 30% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,684,533
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,617
of 11,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,582
of 449,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#35
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.