↓ Skip to main content

The Relevancy of Data Regarding the Metabolism of Iron to Our Understanding of Deregulated Mechanisms in ALS; Hypotheses and Pitfalls

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relevancy of Data Regarding the Metabolism of Iron to Our Understanding of Deregulated Mechanisms in ALS; Hypotheses and Pitfalls
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2018.01031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Petillon, Rudolf Hergesheimer, Hervé Puy, Philippe Corcia, Patrick Vourc’h, Christian Andres, Zoubida Karim, Hélène Blasco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,172,753
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,023
of 11,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,287
of 469,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#55
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.