The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of Integrated Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Curtin, Shanbao Tong, Junfeng Sun, Jijun Wang, Banu Onaral, Hasan Ayaz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 38 | 21% |
| Psychology | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Engineering | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 72 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,633,160
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,565
of 11,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,160
of 370,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#53
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.