The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multilevel Mapping of Sexual Dimorphism in Intrinsic Functional Brain Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina de Lacy, Elizabeth McCauley, J. Nathan Kutz, Vince D. Calhoun |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 15% |
| Psychology | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,232,325
of 26,518,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#539
of 11,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,270
of 369,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#20
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,518,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.