↓ Skip to main content

When Less Is More – Discrete Tactile Feedback Dominates Continuous Audio Biofeedback in the Integrated Percept While Controlling a Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Less Is More – Discrete Tactile Feedback Dominates Continuous Audio Biofeedback in the Integrated Percept While Controlling a Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard F. Engels, Ahmed W. Shehata, Erik J. Scheme, Jonathon W. Sensinger, Christian Cipriani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 46 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,799
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,610
of 366,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#120
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.