The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety Aspects, Tolerability and Modeling of Retinofugal Alternating Current Stimulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00783 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linus Haberbosch, Abhishek Datta, Chris Thomas, Andreas Jooß, Arvid Köhn, Maria Rönnefarth, Michael Scholz, Stephan A. Brandt, Sein Schmidt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 28% |
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 8 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,613,138
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,407
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,389
of 359,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#172
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.