↓ Skip to main content

Acute Fasting Does Not Induce Cognitive Impairment in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute Fasting Does Not Induce Cognitive Impairment in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00896
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua Zheng, Hoai Ton, Lei Yang, Ning Liufu, Yuanlin Dong, Yiying Zhang, Zhongcong Xie

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,257,401
of 26,445,486 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,275
of 12,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,613
of 352,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#155
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.