↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Neuronal and Astrocyte Derived Exosomes From Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Markers of Neurodegeneration and Cytotoxic Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Neuronal and Astrocyte Derived Exosomes From Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Markers of Neurodegeneration and Cytotoxic Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charisse N. Winston, Haylie K. Romero, Maya Ellisman, Sophie Nauss, David A. Julovich, Tori Conger, James R. Hall, Wendy Campana, Sid E. O’Bryant, Caroline M. Nievergelt, Dewleen G. Baker, Victoria B. Risbrough, Robert A. Rissman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 47 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 55 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,912,433
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,775
of 11,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,197
of 365,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#182
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.