↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the Effects of Mechanical Stimulation on Retinal Ganglion Cell Spontaneous Spiking Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the Effects of Mechanical Stimulation on Retinal Ganglion Cell Spontaneous Spiking Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marica Marrese, Davide Lonardoni, Fabio Boi, Hedde van Hoorn, Alessandro Maccione, Stefano Zordan, Davide Iannuzzi, Luca Berdondini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 22%
Engineering 8 22%
Materials Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,033,424
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,525
of 11,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,751
of 361,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#128
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.