The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensorimotor ECoG Signal Features for BCI Control: A Comparison Between People With Locked-In Syndrome and Able-Bodied Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zachary V. Freudenburg, Mariana P. Branco, Sacha Leinders, Benny H. van der Vijgh, Elmar G. M. Pels, Timothy Denison, Leonard H. van den Berg, Kai J. Miller, Erik J. Aarnoutse, Nick F. Ramsey, Mariska J. Vansteensel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 29% |
| Engineering | 14 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,910,647
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,598
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,218
of 372,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#184
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.