The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Value of Failure in Science: The Story of Grandmother Cells in Neuroscience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ann-Sophie Barwich |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 15% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 69 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 60 | 64% |
Scientists | 28 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 26% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 12 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 20% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#430,511
of 26,510,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#185
of 11,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,220
of 379,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.