You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxciel Zortea, Leticia Ramalho, Rael Lopes Alves, Camila Fernanda da Silveira Alves, Gilberto Braulio, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| Finland | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,680,121
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,929
of 11,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,766
of 480,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#80
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.