The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gait Generation and Its Energy Efficiency Based on Rat Neuromusculoskeletal Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Misaki Toeda, Shinya Aoi, Soichiro Fujiki, Tetsuro Funato, Kazuo Tsuchiya, Dai Yanagihara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,723
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,336
of 474,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#266
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.