↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Gait Treatment With a Single-Leg Hybrid Assistive Limb System After Acute Stroke: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Gait Treatment With a Single-Leg Hybrid Assistive Limb System After Acute Stroke: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Watanabe, Aiki Marushima, Hideki Kadone, Tomoyuki Ueno, Yukiyo Shimizu, Shigeki Kubota, Tenyu Hino, Masayuki Sato, Yoshiro Ito, Mikito Hayakawa, Hideo Tsurushima, Tomoya Takada, Atsuro Tsukada, Hiroyuki Fujimori, Naoaki Sato, Kazushi Maruo, Hiroaki Kawamoto, Yasushi Hada, Masashi Yamazaki, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Eiichi Ishikawa, Yuji Matsumaru, Akira Matsumura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Engineering 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 26 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,168
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402,977
of 473,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#292
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.