The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Visual Functions of Two Amazonian Populations: Possible Consequences of Different Mercury Exposure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliza Maria da Costa Brito Lacerda, Givago da Silva Souza, Maria Izabel Tentes Cortes, Anderson Raiol Rodrigues, Maria Conceição Nascimento Pinheiro, Luiz Carlos de Lima Silveira, Dora Fix Ventura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,102,687
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,317
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,924
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#181
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.