↓ Skip to main content

Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits in Social Anxiety Disorder: What Can Be Learned From Mouse Models?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits in Social Anxiety Disorder: What Can Be Learned From Mouse Models?
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne N. Carlton, Holly Sullivan-Toole, Merage Ghane, John A. Richey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 25%
Neuroscience 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,237,407
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,669
of 11,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,217
of 385,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#165
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.