↓ Skip to main content

Simulation of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Control Schemes for Suppression of Pathological Beta Oscillations in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulation of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Control Schemes for Suppression of Pathological Beta Oscillations in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E. Fleming, Eleanor Dunn, Madeleine M. Lowery

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 60 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 27 18%
Neuroscience 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 65 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,163,600
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,180
of 11,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,255
of 388,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#194
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.