The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Steady-State Visual-Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker for Concussion: A Pilot Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00171 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daryl H. C. Fong, Adrian Cohen, Philip Boughton, Paul Raftos, Joseph E. Herrera, Neil G. Simon, David Putrino |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Lecturer | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,244,650
of 26,787,735 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,102
of 12,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,470
of 392,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#204
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,787,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.