The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walking the Tightrope: A Proposed Model of Chronic Pain and Stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire E. Lunde, Christine B. Sieberg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Psychology | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,467,185
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#681
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,412
of 397,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#22
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.