The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exoskeleton Walk Training in Paralyzed Individuals Benefits From Transcutaneous Lumbar Cord Tonic Electrical Stimulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00416 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Y. Shapkova, Elena V. Pismennaya, Dmitriy V. Emelyannikov, Yury Ivanenko |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 23% |
Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 16 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,122,534
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,903
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,220
of 427,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#352
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.