The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Formal String Instrument Training in a Class Setting Enhances Cognitive and Sensorimotor Development of Primary School Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00567 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clara E. James, Sascha Zuber, Elise Dupuis-Lozeron, Laura Abdili, Diane Gervaise, Matthias Kliegel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,761,685
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,756
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,711
of 421,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#145
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.