The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Behavioral and Neural Arguments of Motivational Influence on Decision Making During Uncertainty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Giustiniani, Magali Nicolier, Juliana Teti Mayer, Thibault Chabin, Caroline Masse, Nathan Galmès, Lionel Pazart, Benoit Trojak, Djamila Bennabi, Pierre Vandel, Emmanuel Haffen, Damien Gabriel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,423,611
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,414
of 11,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,359
of 436,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#98
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.