The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized, Double-Blind Assessment of LFP Versus SUA Guidance in STN-DBS Lead Implantation: A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00611 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Musa Ozturk, Ilknur Telkes, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed, Ashwin Viswanathan, Arjun Tarakad, Suneel Kumar, Sameer A. Sheth, Nuri F. Ince |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 10 | 17% |
| Engineering | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,426,807
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,388
of 11,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,898
of 438,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#203
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.