↓ Skip to main content

Mediation of Cardiac Macrophage Activity via Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mediation of Cardiac Macrophage Activity via Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chee Hooi Chung, Beatrice Bretherton, Satirah Zainalabidin, Susan A. Deuchars, Jim Deuchars, Mohd Kaisan Mahadi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,921,959
of 26,539,834 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,821
of 12,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,986
of 431,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#143
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,539,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.