The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immunohistological and Ultrastructural Study of the Inflammatory Response to Perforated Polyimide Cortical Implants: Mechanisms Underlying Deterioration of Electrophysiological Recording Quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00926 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shun-Ho Huang, Nava Shmoel, Maciej M. Jankowski, Hadas Erez, Aviv Sharon, Wesal Abu-Salah, Israel Nelken, Aryeh Weiss, Micha E. Spira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,766,733
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,003
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,248
of 429,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#264
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.