The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pain Relief Dependent on IL-17–CD4+ T Cell–β-Endorphin Axis in Rat Model of Brachial Plexus Root Avulsion After Electroacupuncture Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.596780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zihang Xu, Yangzhuangzhuang Zhu, Jun Shen, Lin Su, Yifei Hou, Mingxi Liu, Xiaoning Jiao, Xiao Chen, Shiguo Zhu, Yechen Lu, Chao Yao, Lixin Wang, Chenyuan Gong, Zhenzhen Ma, Chunpu Zou, Jianguang Xu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,117,293
of 26,315,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,027
of 11,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,330
of 552,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#127
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,315,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 552,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.