The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: T Cell Responses to Neural Autoantigens Are Similar in Alzheimer's Disease Patients and Age-Matched Healthy Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.641809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rekha Dhanwani, John Pham, Ashmitaa Logandha Ramamoorthy Premlal, April Frazier, Atul Kumar, Maria Elena Pero, Francesca Bartolini, Juliana Rezende Dutra, Karen S. Marder, Bjoern Peters, David Sulzer, Alessandro Sette, Cecilia S. Lindestam Arlehamn |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,487,394
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,511
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,794
of 523,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#130
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.