The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel Graphene Electrode for Retinal Implants: An in vivo Biocompatibility Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.615256 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diep Nguyen, Manon Valet, Julie Dégardin, Leyna Boucherit, Xavi Illa, Jose de la Cruz, Elena del Corro, Jessica Bousquet, Jose A. Garrido, Clément Hébert, Serge Picaud |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,417
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,375
of 451,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#316
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.