↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.643205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Chen, Zhe Wang, Ruijuan Dong, Xinxing Fu, Yuan Wang, Shuo Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 17 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 19 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,502,470
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,810
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,512
of 461,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#239
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.