↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimaging in the Understanding of Acupuncture Analgesia: A Review of Acupuncture Neuroimaging Study Based on Experimental Pain Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroimaging in the Understanding of Acupuncture Analgesia: A Review of Acupuncture Neuroimaging Study Based on Experimental Pain Models
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.648305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ma Peihong, Qu Yuzhu, Yin Tao, He Zhaoxuan, Cheng Shirui, Teng Yuke, Xie Kunnan, Li Shenghong, Sun Ruirui, Zeng Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 11 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,399,152
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,658
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,486
of 456,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#171
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.